When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On January 17, 2017, the Defendant who damaged property: (a) paid the operating fee under the influence of alcohol in G-si operated by the victim F (59 years old) of the E hotel in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, and (b) was demanded by the injured party to continue to discharge from the said taxi; (c) the Defendant, who was in the said taxi, was in the Plaintiff’s own possession of the victim who was in the said taxi, was in the Plaintiff’s possession of the victim and was in the Plaintiff’s possession of the said taxi, ordered the support party to display an indoor ESD sign, etc. leading to the “an empty vehicle and operation” and caused the support party to take charge of the repair cost.

2. The Defendant who interferes with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and at the Daejeon U.S. H District Police Station, called upon 112, asked the Defendant about his personal information, the circumstances of the case, etc.

In doing so, the Babbbucks of I’s right-hand bucks are used to assault I’s right-handbucks once.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of the F and I statements;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It shall be included in the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, such as the reflection of the reason for sentencing, the victim F agreement, and the Defendant’s money deposit due to the intent of the conditional punishment of the I deposit in the police officer, and the two times of a fine not to have any record of punishment other than the fine.