2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. At the time of 2009, the Plaintiff’s Dong representative dismissed the Plaintiff’s Dong representative, and the Plaintiff is Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

2) The representative meeting of the council of occupants' representatives (hereinafter referred to as "representative meeting of this case").

Around August 4, 2009, Defendant C served as the Dong-dong representative and general secretary, Defendant C served as the head of the apartment management office of this case, Defendant D as the Dong-dong representative and auditor, Defendant F and E as the managing director, respectively. Around August 4, 2009, Defendant D and G as the managing director, respectively. Around May 4, 2009, the Plaintiff prepared a written consent from the residents requesting occasional audit that the Plaintiff carried out 436,150 of the management expenses of the apartment of this case without a resolution of the council of occupants’ representatives, and posted it on the apartment bulletin board of this case.

3) On August 7, 2009, I, an occupant of the instant apartment, prepared a written consent to dismissal as referred to in the foregoing paragraph 2, and received the written consent to dismissal from the occupant of the instant apartment from the 109 occupant of the instant apartment, and then received the said written consent to dismissal from the Plaintiff on August 7, 2009, but did not reach the quorum (at least 2/3 of the total 40 households) and returned the written consent to dismissal from the Plaintiff.

4) On August 10, 2009, Defendant D, F, etc. received the written consent of dismissal from 109 and 10 households of the instant apartment and received the said written consent of dismissal, and on the same day, Defendant D submitted a written consent of non-Confidence to the Plaintiff and received it by 2/3 or more of the number of households 109 and 29 households pursuant to Article 18(2) Subparagraph 8 of the instant apartment management rules. (B) Defendant D submitted a written consent of non-Confidence to the Plaintiff. (1) Defendant D et al., on December 11, 2009, at the special meeting of the representative meeting of the instant apartment, which was held without being elected by 3 representatives among the total 26 Dongs of the instant apartment, the total number of members present at the representative meeting of the instant apartment and submitted 13 votes from 19 members present at the meeting.

Defendant D is present at the extraordinary meeting of the Representative Council of this case on February 6, 2010 thereafter.