However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On December 1, 2018, at around 04:10 on December 1, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the business, at the “D” drinking house for the victim’s operation of Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu B and 3, and at the same time, the victim used to calculate the drinking value to the Defendant who was the customer, and the victim took a bath to the victim as follows: “Is such weather, Ispath, Ispath, Ispath, Ispath, Ispath.” The Defendant interfered with the victim’s said drinking business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes.

2. 모욕 및 공무집행방해 피고인은 제1항 기재 일시 및 장소에서, ‘손님이 계산을 하지 않고 있다.’는 내용의 112신고를 받고 출동한 인천삼산경찰서 E지구대 소속 경찰관인 피해자 F가 피고인에게 술값을 계산하고 귀가할 것을 권유하자 위 112신고자인 C 등이 지켜보는 앞에서 피해자에게 큰소리로 “경찰관이 대단한거냐, 이런 씨발새끼야, 뭐 어쩔 건데 개새끼들아, 짭새새끼들아.”라고 수회에 걸쳐 욕설을 하는 등 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였고, 이후 위 F와 함께 출동한 위 E지구대 소속 경찰관인 G이 인적사항도 밝히지 아니한 채 현장을 이탈하려고 하는 피고인을 제지하자 이에 격분하여 손으로 G의 뺨 부위를 3회 가격하는 등 G에게 폭행을 가하여 경찰관의 112신고 사건처리에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements to C, F, and G;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the "justifiable circumstances") of the suspended sentence;

1. Scope of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one month but not more than seven years and June;