2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant repents his mistake.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been traded, given, given, or administered by the Defendant, and the nature of the crime is not very good; the number of times of the crime is not many; the transfer of the phiphones that are traded, given, given, and received without a lot of frequency; the balance of sentencing with the same crime; the Defendant’s age, sex and environment; the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are considered, and thus, it is deemed unfair for the lower court’s punishment to be too unreasonable. Thus, the above

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.