A. On October 28, 2009, the Defendant forged a private document under the title “D”, “E” in the name column, “E” in the resident number column, and “F apartment 114-2107 in the Gyeonggi-do Pakistan-si” in the content column, and in the content column, the Defendant renounced all superficies by March 20, 2019, returned to the lessor and did not raise any objection to the criminal charge.

"..." The D's seal was affixed to D's name and affixed to D's name, and forged a copy of D's waiver of superficies in the name of the private document on rights and obligations.

2. On October 28, 2009, the Defendant: (a) delivered one copy of the waiver note of superficies under the name of D, which was forged, to H who was aware of the fact, as if they were duly formed; and (b) exercised it.

2. We examine the judgment, D, stating that there is no fact from the investigative agency to the court that there was no statement of waiver of the superficies of this case, and according to the results of the review by the National Scientific Investigation Institute on the request of appraisal, the stamp image affixed on the termination of the superficies of this case shall be presumed to be different from the stamp image affixed on the termination of the superficies of this case. Accordingly, the rejection of the superficies of this case is deemed to have been forged.

On the other hand, H has consistently stated that since the investigative agency since it requested that the defendant accept a written waiver of superficies from D and received the first written waiver of superficies from the defendant (the 20th page of the investigation record), and that the defendant received the first written waiver of superficies (the 22th page of the investigation record), and that the defendant received the first written waiver of superficies (the 22th page of the investigation record) along with the first written waiver of superficies (the 22th page of the investigation record).