피고인은 2015. 5. 24. 22:10경 서울 노원구 한글비석로 24다길 45에 있는 ‘마을마당’ 공원에서 술을 마시며 시끄럽게 소란을 피우다가 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 서울노원경찰서 C지구대 소속 경위 D, 경위 E으로부터 경범죄처벌법위반으로 단속되어 범칙금통고처분서를 발부받자 이에 화가 나, 마시고 있던 막걸리 병과 피고인의 휴대전화를 위 D 쪽 바닥으로 집어 던지고, 위 통고처분서를 찢어 버리는 등 위협적인 기세를 보이면서 위 경찰관들에게 “야, 씹새끼들아, 성동구치소로 보내줘라, 갔다 와서 니네 씹새끼들 다 죽여 버린다, 못 죽이나 봐라 씹새끼들아”라고 소리쳐 위 D, E을 협박하고, 이에 위 D이 피고인을 체포하려 하자 발로 위 D의 무릎 부분을 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by threatening and assaulting police officers, interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The first and second police statements made to D;

1. C district unit 112 patrol posts;

1. Investigation report (payment notice and receipt of suspect penalty);

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing selective sentence of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment for one month to five years; and

2. The scope of recommendations on the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommendations] shall be the basic area (two months of imprisonment to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the obstruction of performance of official duties).

3. The fact that the defendant's decision on the sentence of punishment has been divided in depth into and reflected in his own crime is favorable to the defendant, or the circumstances leading the defendant to the crime of this case, the method and method leading the defendant to commit the crime of this case, and the police officer, who is the victim,