2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On June 29, 2014, the Plaintiff (acquisition of Class I ordinary driver’s license on January 9, 1981) driven a B B small private taxi on the front day of an apartment complex while under the influence of alcohol of 00:10% of the blood alcohol concentration of 0.199%.

B. Accordingly, on July 21, 2014, the Defendant issued the instant disposition against the Plaintiff, revoking the Plaintiff’s driver’s license as of August 11, 2014.

C. On July 31, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal on the instant disposition, but was dismissed by the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on August 26, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. On June 28, 2014, the day before the plaintiff's assertion of this case, after completing the 22:00 day on June 28, 2014, and after completing the 22:0 day, drinking was conducted while entering into the D restaurant located in Young-gun C, Young-gun, including the issue of delivery and home, etc., which became a self-employed taxi, but at night, he did not run at the latest, but at night, he was found to have been driving without drinking, because the distance from the restaurant to the house is 1 km, and thus, he was apprehended to stop driving. The driving of this case is against the depth of the driving of this case; the driver's license was suspended due to a traffic accident that caused physical damage on or around October 1986; the driver's license was suspended on one occasion other than those that caused traffic accidents, and the driver's license was revoked on or around April 2005, and the driver's license was revoked on an officetel that was scheduled to be supported by the plaintiff.