A Imprisonment with prison labor for four months, for six months, for each of six months.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

1. Around February 17, 2004, the Defendants and accomplices were to serve as the Defendants: (a) entered into a contract with the committee for promotion of apartment housing reconstruction and improvement projects (hereinafter referred to as “promotion committee”) and entered into a legal service contract; (b) removed the Chairperson of the promotion committee on March 6, 2010; (c) was elected on June 28, 201 as the chairperson of the promotion committee; and (d) was authorized to revise the promotion committee on August 6, 2010; and (d) was newly designated on December 30, 201 after obtaining approval of the project plan combining the improvement project district with the promotion committee and the G reconstruction association on April 9, 201; and (e) completed the authorization for the establishment of the reconstruction association on August 15, 2013 as the head of the renewal association and the head of the reconstruction association on September 25, 2013.

I would dismiss the FF Chairperson from D around March 2010 while supporting the F Chairperson from around March 2006, and will share the interests of all cooperative agreements, such as the selection of removal design and construction works of the union, if the Chairperson is the Chairperson. ‘I will accept the proposal and then stay in the office of the Promotion Committee after accepting it.

As the secretary of SipD, business related persons such as maintenance, design, removal, etc., and the business affairs such as the receipt and execution of non-financial funds such as the street expenses of association members and authorizing and permitting public officials have been conducted on

Defendant

A is the managing director of the J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “J”), who is a specialized manager of rearrangement projects, and Defendant B is the managing director of the K Certified Architects Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “K”), who is a designer, and Defendant C is the representative director of L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “L”) who is a specialized manager of rearrangement projects.

2. Defendant A

A. D around August 2010, after entering the Defendant and I, a maintenance business operator who had supported the initial Francing Chairman, leading to the Francing Chairman, and allowing the Francing Chairman to resign.