On November 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated that the victim CO was “a cell phone which needs to be calculated”; (b) obtained a cell phone from the victim’s cell phone and made the victim enter the mobile merchandise settlement information into the victim’s computer data processing unit without authority; and (c) obtained two copies of the 10,000 won main points right; (d) two copies of the 30,000 won main points right; and (e) two copies of the 50,000 won main points right; and (e) one, 1,30,000 won item merchandise coupon; and (e) one, 1,50,000 won item merchandise coupon; and (e) 1,20,000 won item merchandise coupon; and (e) 1,290,000 won merchandise coupon; and (e) made payment equivalent to the sum of the 2,90,000 won value of the Internet merchandise coupon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on simple statements, details of coophones purchase, and response data;

1. Relevant Articles 347-2 (Fraud by Use of Computer, etc.) of the Criminal Act and choice of imprisonment for the crime;