A. Defendant B, (1) among the real estate listed in [Attachment 1 List No. 4], Defendant B indicated in the Attached Form No. 179, 180, 183, 184, and

A. Fact 1) On October 18, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) each of the real estate listed in [Attachment 1] Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 owned by the Plaintiff to Defendant B (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

A) B leased KRW 30 million, KRW 3.2 million per month of rent (excluding value-added tax), and the lease period from October 18, 2013 to November 1, 2018 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

(2) Defendant B leased the instant real estate from the Plaintiff, and established obstacles, etc. (hereinafter “instant obstacles, etc.”) on the instant real estate, such as the table Nos. 1 through 21 of the attached Table Nos. 2 on the instant real estate, and operated the board recycling factory with the mutual name “D”.

3) From November 2013 to December 2013, Defendant B delayed payment to the Plaintiff. Accordingly, on April 16, 2014, the Plaintiff sent to the said Defendant a letter of proof that the said lease contract will be terminated if Defendant B did not pay the unpaid rent of KRW 11 million by April 25, 2014 on the grounds of the unpaid rent of at least two years of arrears, and then the Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 3 million on May 7, 2014, and KRW 5 million on the same month, but again, the Plaintiff did not pay the remainder of the rent. On July 24, 2014, the Plaintiff deemed the unpaid rent of KRW 11,00 (excluding value-added tax) to the effect that the said lease contract would be terminated by April 25, 2014.

5) Defendant B owned the above obstacles above the instant real estate up to the present day. The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 1-1, 3 through 9, Gap evidence 2, Gap evidence 4-1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. Judgment 1 as to the termination of the instant lease agreement, this case.