손해배상(기)
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified by the modification (reduction) of a claim made by this court as follows:
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The relationship between the parties 1) Defendant C, D, E, F, G, H, and I are J Apartment-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”).
(2) On September 3, 2012, Plaintiff A entered into an employment contract with Defendant Representative Council and worked as the head of the management office of the instant apartment.
B. On August 18, 2014, the head of Seoan-si Office imposed an administrative fine of KRW 3,00,000 on the Plaintiff on August 18, 2014. Pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, a list of Attached Table 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited, and the details of the judgment are omitted. The Plaintiff filed an objection on September 15, 2014. On November 11, 2014, the Daejeon District Court rendered a decision to impose an administrative fine of KRW 3,00,000 on the Plaintiff (Articles 2014 and 612). The Plaintiff filed an objection against the decision of the administrative fine of KRW 3,00 on November 14, 2014, the Daejeon District Court support was recognized to have not imposed the administrative fine of KRW 30,000 on the Plaintiff on the ground of the violation of the attached Table 1, but the head of the Gu did not impose the administrative fine of KRW 25, 10.
Pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the attached list 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited, and separate entries in this judgment shall be omitted.
On June 1, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an objection, and on October 28, 2015, the Daejeon District Court rendered a decision to impose an administrative fine of KRW 3,000,000 on the Plaintiff (2015 and 2214).
On November 6, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an objection against the decision of a fine for negligence, and the Daejeon District Court rendered a decision not to impose an administrative fine in consideration of all circumstances, including the circumstances of the violation, although it is deemed that the violation was committed on December 8, 2015.
C. Article 34(1) of the Management Rules of the apartment of this case where the election of the Defendant Representative Meeting is delayed.