When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From February 5, 2009 to March 29, 2016, the Defendant is a person who operates infant and child care facilities in the trade name of “E childcare center” on the first floor of Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, from September 1, 2015 to February 28, 2016, and F is a person who works for the said “E childcare center” as an assistant teacher.

In principle, a teacher in charge of a child-care center shall work from 09:00 to 18:00, and only a teacher in charge registered in the jurisdiction of the Gu may be paid a teacher's allowance (work environment improvement expenses, improvement of treatment expenses, and research activities expenses), and a part-time teacher such as a part-time teacher shall not be paid a teacher's allowance from the Gu office, and a child-care center registered as a teacher in charge of a child-care center shall not be paid basic infant care fees on the premise of a teacher in charge.

Nevertheless, in collusion with F, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with F, filed a false registration of a teacher with the said “E Child Care Center” from around September 2, 2015 to January 22, 2016 as a teacher working on the preceding day at the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government Office even though he/she had worked half-day from around 09:00 to around 14:00; (b) applied for a false registration of a teacher’s allowance; and (c) was granted by the said office of Yeonsu-gu in Yeonsu-gu, Yeonsu-gu, as a basic childcare fee, a total of KRW 6,343,020 of the subsidies, including KRW 4,053,00,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. A copy of the work book attached to a written accusation, and a copy of employment contract;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to details of payment of childcare expenses in the Yeonsu-gu Office);

1. Article 54 (2) 1 of the Infant Care Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The assertion that the defendant has worked from 9:0 a.m. to 2:0 p.m. in the child care center of this case as if he had worked 8 hours in the child care center of this case and reported it to the competent authorities, but F.