When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

While the Defendant, while carrying on the business of delivery in Gangnam-gu Seoul as the trade name “C” in Gangnam-gu Seoul, refused the extension of the lease term, the Defendant voluntarily set up a new lease agreement under the name of D and decided to register it with the tax office using it on the ground that it may no longer be engaged in business at that place.

1. On February 28, 2014, the Defendant forged private document at the above commercial building “Seoul Gangnam-gu” land and land category column in the column of location of the real estate lease contract, stating that “305.9m2,” “305.9m in the building and structure column,” “6,” “652.36,” “one million won in the deposit column,” “one million won in the deposit column,” “one million won in the payment column,” “one million won in the payment column shall be paid on March 3, 2014,” and in the rent column, “one million won in the daily payment shall be paid on March 30, 2014” as the date “Seoul-gu resident registration number,” “EF telephone,” and “D’s name in the lessor’s address column after entering “Seoul-gu” in the lessor’s name and signature in the name of D” column.

Accordingly, the defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease contract in the name of D, which is a private document on the right and duty to exercise.

2. On March 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) filed a false real estate lease agreement with a public official under the name of the Defendant, who was aware of the forgery, while operating his/her business at a regional tax office located in the regional tax office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; and (b) filed it with the said public official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused and G;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a real estate lease contract;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of uttering of falsified Investigation Documents), respectively;