1. At around 20:00 on May 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) ordered the victim E (59 years of age) to extract a part of 10 gretains of the victim E (59 years of age) at the seat of the Cheongdo-gun C, but was 12 grecing so that the victim E (59 years of age) was freshed, shreshed into a bresh and pushed down, and carried out a bresh box that requires treatment for 14 days.

2. In light of the above facts charged, there is a statement and a medical certificate by the victim, as long as it seems consistent with the above facts charged that the defendant committed a spambling event requiring 14-day medical treatment to the victim.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record are as follows: ① on the day of the instant case, the police did not find any special wound or trace on the part of the Defendant’s title on the photograph before the instant case; ② the victim thought that there was a case, and that there was no need for the investigative agency to find a box subsequent to the instant case, and that there was only the hospital would want to do so; ③ the victim was issued a medical certificate of injury to the hospital after the lapse of three days after the instant case occurred; ④ the doctor issued the said medical certificate was merely a clinical presumption; ④ the victim issued the said certificate of diagnosis at all times before and after May 18, 2014, it is difficult to say that the victim was unable to have received the above medical certificate of injury, and the victim stated that there was no “the victim received the above medical certificate of injury” as an “the victim was issued with an assault on the day of the instant case.”