The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, by misapprehending the legal principles on the legitimacy of execution of official duties

In addition, even upon examining the record, the lower court did not err by infringing the Defendant’s right to inspect and copy the trial records, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.