사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.
The defendant shall take money of two million won by deceit to the applicant for compensation and shall do so.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal record] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months of imprisonment for fraud in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on August 31, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 8, 2016, and is currently under suspended sentence.
[Criminal facts] The Defendant, “2017 Highest 791,” received money by Internet goods fraud, and used money to repay debts.
On September 29, 2016, the Defendant puts a letter “pop-up pop-up shop” on the Rober’s Korean camera at a place no more than the end of the 2016. On September 29, 2016, the Defendant reported this to the victim D who contacted the victim D with “on the first hand, he will give money to the victim who is in sight of a registered article.”
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, since the defendant did not have visibilitys, even if he receives the value of visibility from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the reputations.
Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as above; (b) received KRW 1,700,000 from the Busan Bank Account (E) in the name of the Defendant for the purchase price for a reputation item on the same day from the injured party; and (c) received from that time a total of KRW 15,486,00 in the same manner as shown in the attached Table 1, from January 2, 2017, from that time, a sum of KRW 22 times in the same manner as in the attached Table 1.
Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving victims, acquired each property.
On January 28, 2017, the Defendant puts up a letter stating that “Ieland is selling co-clocks” in NAV and Iekland at a place of no more than 1,154 p.m. Around 28, 2017, the Defendant would first transfer money to F.m., and then deliver Ieland Iek for delivery to F.m.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, the defendant did not have the above visibility, so even if he receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the visibility.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above and is the same from the victim.