손실보상금
1. The defendant's money stated in the "Difference" column in the attached Table 2 to the plaintiffs, and each corresponding money;
A. Plaintiffs B, C, and D.
1. Details of ruling;
A. On June 15, 2011, the head of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government announced the authorization to implement the “A Area Housing Redevelopment Project” implemented by the Defendant pursuant to Article 28 of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (wholly amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017).
(Seomun-gu M). (b)
In order to acquire each land, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “land, etc. to be expropriated in this case”) indicated in attached Table 2, which are owned by the plaintiffs in the above improvement zone, the local land expropriation committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City applied for adjudication. On August 25, 2017, the local land expropriation committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City determined the commencement date of expropriation as of October 20, 2017, and accepted the land, etc. to be expropriated on the basis of the commencement date of expropriation. However, pursuant to Article 30(3) of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation therefor (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”), the local land expropriation ruling was rendered to pay additional charges for delay for the same period as the attached Table 3’s “repayment sheet.
C. On June 21, 2018, the Central Land Expropriation Committee filed an objection against the said adjudication of expropriation. On June 21, 2018, the Central Land Expropriation Committee changed the compensation amount for the land, etc. subject to expropriation as indicated in the “amount of compensation” column in attached Table 2, and made an objection to the change of additional charges for delay under Article 30(3) of the Land Compensation Act as stated in attached Table 3 “the “the statement of delayed additional charges” in attached Table 3 (hereinafter “the instant adjudication”).
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 12 (including branch numbers in case of additional number), the purport of whole pleadings
2. As to the claim for increase in compensation for losses for the land to be expropriated in this case
A. The Plaintiff K and the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Seodae-gu 53 square meters, which are owned by the Plaintiff K and L, are 6 square meters.