However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 23:30 on May 6, 2019, the Defendant driven Dpoter 2, while under the influence of alcohol 0.194% of the blood alcohol concentration from around 2km section from the front day of the restaurant soup, soup to the front day of the restaurant located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, to the day of the restaurant located in the Nam-gu, Southern-si, the Defendant driven Dpoter 2, while under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving and the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018) (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018) that provides applicable legal provisions on criminal facts and Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 of the same Act (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (it shall be taken into consideration that there is no other force on criminal punishment, such as a violation of the duty of care and a violation of the said Act);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;