beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.01.17 2016고단5962

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

1. Defendant A and D are punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,000, KRW 5,000, KRW 000, KRW 300, and Defendant C are punished by a fine of KRW 2,50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B and Defendant D’s joint crime committed on December 2, 2015 to January 2, 2016, operated a commercial sex business establishment in G in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, and Defendant D was informed of the commercial sex acts time by cleaning the room and placing a door to the female commercial sex acts.

During the above period, the Defendants employed female employees, including H, at the above business establishment, and had female employees attend sexual intercourse with the above male workers by receiving the price for sexual traffic of KRW 8 to 150,000 in cash per hour from the male customers who are not in a name.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. No person who is a defendant B shall engage in activities and install facilities falling under juvenile access and employment-prohibited establishments which conduct business in a school environment sanitation and cleanup zone within a 200-meter radius from the boundary of a school, which is likely to conduct sexual acts or acts of similarity;

Nevertheless, the defendant had operated commercial sex acts in the school sanitation cleanup zone by keeping bed and operating the said business at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1.

3. On December 2015, Defendant A introduced H as female employees to engage in sexual traffic in the foregoing G around December 2015, the Defendant received 700,000 won in return.

As a result, the defendant introduced an occupation to sell sex and received the payment for the occupation.

4. Defendant C, despite being aware of the fact that Defendant C was engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic as above at the above time and place, he provided the above G with the act of arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the police officer regarding I;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Copies of books and pocketbooks;

1. Investigation report (whether it is in violation of the School Health Act - positive application of statutes);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Article 19(2)3 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging Sexual Traffic.