beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2013.10.11 2013고합53

강도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a victim C (the 85 years of age, the 1st person with visual disability), the victim D (the 80 years of age, the 80 years of age), and the female life of the victim E (the 59 years of age).

1. From around 3:00 to 12:00 on January 15, 2013, the robbery Defendant: (a) moved the victim C and the victim D, who was divingd in the house of the victim C and the victim D, in a small room; (b) led the victim C to the inside of the victim C; and (c) led the victim C to the inside of the victim; (d) “I create a KRW 100 million; (e) make the victim D’s head debt; (e) put the victim D’s head debt on the wall and room; and (e) cut the victim D’s mark on several occasions; and (e) cut the victim D’s subject.

In addition, the victims had been faced with several times on the wall and the floor of the victim by putting them off, "I am in money if I want to do not do so." The victims could not resist because I am against the wall and the floor of the victim.

Therefore, without giving money to the victim D, the defendant was dead, and the defendant took the head of the Tong and the seal owned by the victim C, which was kept in the state of the state of the incident, and was set up on the floor of the room, and the defendant took the above head of the Tong and the seal after cutting off them.

2. At around 13:00 on January 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stated that the “if found” in the form of a claim for the deposit “where found” that was kept in the form of an agricultural cooperative located in Seocho-gu, Seosan-gu, Seosan-gu, Jin-si, Jin-si, the Defendant affixed C’s seal cited above on the name of the claimant, stating the “C” in the form of claim for the deposit amount; and (b) affixed C’s seal attached thereto.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged one copy of the deposit claim in C name, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and submitted the forged deposit claim to the employee in charge who is aware of the forgery as if he were actually prepared.

3. The criminal defendant is a true depositor at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (2) in the same manner as that mentioned in paragraph (2).