1. At the time of January 2012, the Defendant: (a) had served as the site manager of the G company; (b) had been able to obtain a subcontract from the G company to acquire money from the victim BG by committing an act as if he had the right of pipeline construction; and (c) has planned to forge one copy of the construction contract under the name of the G company by means of such intent.

On January 12, 2012, the Defendant entered the title into a construction contract by using a computer program into “construction contract” in the BF site office located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju. On January 12, 2012, the Defendant entered the contents such as “construction: The name of construction: The C.C. (Pipe)”, “the contract amount: 730,000,000 (including cost for transporting materials): the non: the representative of the G company (A): L: L: The Defendant posted the seal under the name of the representative director of the G company, who was kept in custody after printing it into A4 paper by using the ninter.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a “construction contract” under the name of G company, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On January 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) delivered to BG, who is aware of the forgery, one copy of the “construction contract” under the name of the forged G company, as if it were a document duly formed.

3. In fact, the Defendant did not have been awarded a subcontract for the pipeline construction right from the G company during the construction of the Clean Ballast, and did not have the ability to transfer the above pipeline construction right to the victim BG.

Nevertheless, around January 12, 2012, the Defendant issued one copy of the “construction contract” contract in the name of a G company that is forged to the victim BG in the BF site office located in the Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, and the Defendant issued the pipeline construction right from G company.