2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 18:40 on April 21, 2016, the Defendant attached a part of the victim’s face to the victim’s neck in the south-gu Seoul metropolitan area on the ground that the victim E (55 years of age) does not get off his/her vehicle in the front side in the Nam-gu Gwangju metropolitan area. On the other hand, the Defendant left the victim’s face more than twice by drinking the victim’s face, and the victim’s macks the victim’s face one time in the middle of about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act constitutes self-defense, as stated in its reasoning, only sealed the victim for the purpose of protecting the defendant's knife and kn't inflict any injury on the victim, and there was no intention of injury.

However, the victim E statements from the investigative agency to this court to the purport that "the defendant has suffered losses due to the problem of consistently reducing the difference, and the defendant first inflicted injury upon him as stated in its reasoning." The victim E received the report of "112 and called to the site, at the time of being called to the site, made the defendant enter his hand in a very highly scard state, and ordered the victim to stop sailing."

In light of the statement of police officers F's legal statement or injury diagnosis statement, the victim's attitude to make a statement in this court, etc., the victim's above statement is credibility.

In light of the above statements by the victim, it is recognized that the defendant intentionally inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the judgment of the victim, and the defendant's act does not constitute self-defense.

Therefore, the above argument is not accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Article 11 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of deaf-mutes;

1. Article 70(1) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.