However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is believed to be the victim C (math, 75 years of age).

피고인은 2014. 3. 29. 21:00경 위 피해자의 주거지에서, 술에 취하여 강아지를 때리는 것을 본 피해자가 “들어가 자거라, 술에 취하면 자는 것이 약이다, 너는 왜 그렇게 술을 쳐 먹으면 헛소리를 하느냐”라고 하였다는 이유로 화가 나, 피해자가 입고 있던 잠바를 붙잡고 피해자의 머리 위로 뒤집어씌운 뒤 피해자를 부엌으로 끌고 간 다음, 주먹으로 피해자의 온 몸을 수 회 때려 바닥에 넘어뜨리고, 발로 피해자의 등과 머리 부위를 밟고 가슴 부위를 2회 찼다.

The defendant continues to flee in the present room to see whether the victim is "I am about to flee" and the victim "I am "I am in the house" and the defendant is "victim" in the defendant's indictment in the D apartment 10 dong 403 am in the city of 10-dong 403 am along with the defendant is obvious that the "victim" is a clerical error in the "defendant".

The defendant's mother entered the family house with the defendant and entered the house together with the defendant's mother. The defendant was suffering from head in the door of the visit by breaking down the victim's side gate once and destroying the victim's back neck over the next floor once.

The defendant followed another victim's cresh that the defendant's bombs of the above apartment house in front of the above apartment house, kid up the victim's lock, kid up the bend floor, kid up with the victim's kid, kid together with the victim's house, and kid up with the victim's house, kid up the back part of the victim's back at the house, kidd up the victim's kid up on the floor, and kid up the victim's kid by hand, and kid up the victim's kids.

As a result, the defendant suffered multiple scopic typiles, etc., which require approximately two weeks of treatment to the surviving victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's oral statement;