beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.11.14 2013고단1221

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 1221"

1. At around 21:50 on January 22, 2013, the Defendant driven a Bnub motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.092%, without obtaining a driver’s license, from the front of a restaurant in the mutual influence 2-dong, to the front of the road in the outer-do 1-dong 1-dong 7 kilometers.

2. On March 13, 2013, at around 00:51, the Defendant driven a nub motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.103% of alcohol content without obtaining a driver’s license, at the section of approximately one kilometer from the location of the off-dong office in the 00:51, 00,000, to the road in front of the same Dong, such as a food signal signal, etc. in the same Dong.

around 21:20 on March 26, 2013, the Defendant driven a Nuba car in the state of under the influence of alcohol content 0.125% without a driver’s license, in the direction of the waiting center located in Hancheon-ro 47 in Hancheon-ro, Hancheon-si, Do, Nam-si, Jeju-do.

around 10:48 on September 14, 2013, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.094% at the 0.094% due to the low-income outflow from the low-income bracket in the Hari-ri Hari-Eup, Hari-ri, Hari-si, and without a driver’s license, while driving a B-La car without a mandatory insurance policy.

At the time, there was an intersection in which signal apparatus was installed on the front of the running direction of the defendant, and on the day, the surface was milched on the same day, so the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to accurately operate and proceed with the steering direction and operation of the steering gear by securing the safety distance with the vehicle in front and with the vehicle in front.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and fails to secure a safety distance, and due to negligence in failure to operate the brakes properly, the red light of signal apparatus.