경범죄처벌법위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is too unreasonable as the punishment (1.5 million won in penalty) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.
2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized the crime and divided the wrong facts.
However, in the case of the case of 2016 and 2039, the degree of interference with the business due to false reports is not easy, and in the case of the case of the case of the 201:35th male suicide prevention center on the day of the case, a false report was voluntarily accompanied to the district and transferred to the trial for the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act and returned to the house, and again, a false report was made by calling to the Seoul Metropolitan Government suicide prevention center at around 22:25, and the defendant made a false report that he would commit a crime that he was willing to commit by calls to the suicide prevention center several times even before the time, and the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant is judged to be appropriate, and the defendant's argument is too unreasonable, since the defendant's argument is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.