2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case, and that the defendant did not want the punishment of the above victims by mutual consent with each victim of the crime of destruction of property and forced indecent conduct.

However, the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime several times, and each of the crimes of this case was committed during the suspension period of execution due to the same kind of crime, the crime was committed repeatedly while the investigation and trial are in progress, and the victim of the bodily injury wants to be punished by the defendant.

In addition, in full view of the various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that make it possible to change the sentencing of the lower court after the judgment of the lower court, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.