However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 25, 2016, around 12:43, the Defendant assaulted the police officer E, who belongs to the police officer of the Gwangju Northern Police Station D Zone D District, called “picker,” and called “packer,” in front of the C Hospital emergency room in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, with a 112 report, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] [decision of sentence] The defendant does not have any criminal records exceeding the fine. The damaged police officers want the punishment of the defendant, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered.