beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.07.09 2015고단849

사기미수등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was working as an insurance solicitor at the 10th floor Mez fire in Bupyeong-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the 446-3 Mzz buildings, the 10th floor of the 201-dong, and the friendly life of C, who died on April 6, 2014.

1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On February 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had insufficient insurance solicitation performance in the office of the above Mzzz fire sub-branch; (b) had expressed his/her intent to subscribe to the insurance by forging an insurance subscription form of “1309 in the Mzzzz fire 1309, the insured as C,” thereby raising his/her performance.

The Defendant, at the above time and place, entered “C” in the insured column of the Insurance Policy 1309 “Undividend-Madle-Madle-Mae-Ma,” and signed next thereto, forged a private document in the name of C on rights and duties, and immediately submitted it to the person in charge of purchasing the Mzz fire insurance who is aware of the forgery.

B. On March 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) knew that the Defendant-friendly C was faced with her head in the house; (b) had known that the awareness was made in an uneasible state; and (c) had expressed his intent to subscribe to the insurance by forging the insurance subscription form for the 1402 "Flue Mes Mes Mes Mes Mes Mes Mes Mes Mes

On March 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated “C” as “C” in the insured column of the Insurance Subscription Form 1402, using black writing devices at the office of the above Mezz and fire sub-place; and (b) signed next thereto, forged a private document in the name C on the rights and obligations; and (c) immediately submitted it to the person in charge of purchasing the Mez and fire insurance without knowledge of the forgery.

2. Around March 11, 2014, the Defendant’s attempted fraud was not clear due to an accident involving the head of the Defendant’s pro-friendly C beyond the house around March 10, 2014.