(a) Defendant B’s route party is a building listed in the attached Table 1;

B. Defendant C shall record the attached list No. 2.

2. Claim against Defendant C: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act).

3. Claim as to Defendant B’s route party

A. The facts stated in the separate sheet on the grounds of the claim do not conflict between the parties.

According to the main sentence of Article 81 (1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, the owner, etc. of the previous land or structure shall not use or benefit from the previous land or structure until the date of public announcement of transfer under Article 86 of the same

Since the notice of the management and disposal plan was as seen above, the above defendant cannot use or benefit from the real estate specified in the attached Table 1, and is obligated to deliver the above real estate to the plaintiff who is the project implementer.

B. Defendant B’s assertion as to Defendant B’s assertion is without consent to the management and disposition plan, and the appraisal of the instant building cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim before receiving adequate compensation as it significantly falls short of the market price. However, the above circumstance of the above Defendant’s above cannot be a justifiable ground for refusing the Plaintiff’s claim for delivery. Thus, the above assertion is rejected.