beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.03.20 2015고단150

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2015, at around 01:50, the Defendant: (a) expressed his desire to take the Defendant’s house, including, without any reason, the defect in which E (the age 46) the victim, who was sent to the 112 report, intends to take the Defendant’s house, and (b) “I wish to take the Defendant’s face at one time with the left side of drinking,” and (c) calculated the victim’s head at least four times with the right side of drinking; (d) the victim’s head was taken one time on the right side; and (e) the victim’s head was set at the right side, and (e) the victim’s left door was set at one time to interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of the performance of official duties (decision of sentence] / The crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties requires strict diversification because it harms the authority of the public authority and impedes the establishment of legal order. However, although the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case and reflects his mistake, there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, the defendant seems to have committed a crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties by drinking, and the degree of the obstruction of the performance of official duties is somewhat minor, and other circumstances shown in the records such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, home environment, etc. are considered.