부당전보구제재심판정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The details and details of the decision on reexamination was established by the investment of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province and the Korea National Tourism Organization on August 13, 1997, and approximately thirty full-time workers were employed and engaged in service business, such as leasing conference rooms.
On August 1, 2005, the Plaintiff is a weak term of the ICE business conference, reward tourism, competition, exhibition, etc., which is a business sector where the ICE business aims to hold an exchange conference, such as a super-type fair, various international conferences, goods, knowledge, information, etc.
The team has been in charge of the operation and management of the event.
On September 14, 2015, the intervenor transferred the plaintiff to food business team (C Burial operations).
(hereinafter “instant transfer”). On September 21, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for remedy with the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Regional Labor Relations Commission for the instant transfer, and on November 9, 2015, the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Regional Labor Relations Commission accepted an application for remedy on the ground that “the instant transfer is unreasonable, since the need for the instant transfer is not recognized.”
On November 19, 2015, the Intervenor appealed and applied for reexamination to the National Labor Relations Commission on November 19, 2015. On February 11, 2016, the National Labor Relations Commission accepted the application for reexamination on the ground that “The transfer of this case is deemed necessary to conduct business, while the transfer of this case is not deemed to have any disadvantage in daily life, and it is not recognized that such fact is more serious than the invalidation of the transfer of this case, even if the transfer of this case is deemed to have been negligent.”
(hereinafter “instant decision on reexamination” (hereinafter “instant decision on reexamination”). 【No dispute exists; written evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply); and the purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Intervenor by renewal of the employment contract with the period of one year, and entered into an employment contract in the employment contract as “occupational category”.