When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 14, 2011, the Defendant sold Ba in one week, which is in harmony, to the complainant B in front of the Masan-si's Masan-si's Masan-si's Masan-si, and the mother was hospitalized in the hospital, and there is no hospital expenses. If the Defendant borrowed money, he would sell Mara in harmony and repay it.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the complainant, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the complainant who believed this as true has immediately remitted 3 million won to the account in the name of the defendant to the account in the name of the defendant and has acquired financial profits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused (including B substitute part);

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A complaint;

1. Details of transactions by account, and application of credit information-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.