A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A and E return home on October 22, 2013, around 22:00, they drink the alcohol on the front side of “Gmotour” located in Gwangju Mine-gu F.

During the stop of one another’s talks with a large voice, the victim B (the age of 43) who operated the said telecom expressed the victim’s desire to “scoping, obstructing the telecom business, and changing to another place,” and assaulted the victim’s chest by putting the victim’s hair into his/her hair with his/her hair, making him/her go through the victim’s hair, and booming the victim’s back to the back with his/her hand.

As a result, the defendant jointly with E puts the dystypology, diagnosis, etc. of the plesphere total wall that requires treatment for about two weeks.

2. Defendant B asserted with A and the victim E (the age of 49) at the time, time, place, as mentioned in paragraph (1) above, and got spatched and spatched and spatched one another, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as the right spatum, which requires treatment for about 28 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of a witness A, B, and E and part of the witness H’s legal statement;

1. A photograph of damage (E);

1. Each injury diagnosis statement (B and E) (as shown in paragraph (1) of the judgment, Defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that there was no injury caused by assaulting the victim B by assaulting the victim B, and Defendant B and their defense counsel asserted that there was no injury caused by assaulting the victim E as indicated in paragraph (2) of the judgment. However, considering the following circumstances revealed by each evidence of the judgment, namely, the contents of the victims and witnesses are specific and consistent, even in light of the degree of the testimony in the court, credibility exists in the statements of the victims and witnesses, and the parts and degree of the injury suffered by the victims known in the injury diagnosis statement or photographic image are supported by the victims' statements, all of the charges of this case can be found guilty.