성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal against the Defendants is that the lower court’s respective punishment (Defendant A: imprisonment for 8 months; two years of probation; one year of probation; one year of probation observation; 40 hours of lecture to treat sexual assault; 80 hours of community service order; six months of probation; two years of probation probation; two years of probation observation; one year of probation observation; and 80 hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.
2. In light of the following facts: (a) there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment; and (b) the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and pleadings of the instant case, the lower court’s each sentence against the Defendants seems unfair; and (c) thus, the prosecutor’s aforementioned assertion
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.