However, this judgment has become final and conclusive against the defendant.

Defendant

C, 피고인 A은 함께 불법게임장을 하기로 마음먹고 김해시 H에 있는 빈공장을 임대하고, 피고인 C는 전체적인 관리 및 피고인 I이 운행하는 일명 ‘깜깜이’ 차량을 뒤에서 호위하는 역할을, 피고인 A은 게임장 안에서 손님 시중 및 환전을 하는 역할을, 피고인 B는 손님들에게 문자를 보내고 손님을 만나 깜깜이 차량이 있는 곳까지 데리고 오는 역할을, 일명 I(같은 날 기소중지)은 손님들을 깜깜이 차량에 태워 게임장까지 데리고 오는 역할을, 피고인 D는 단속에 대비하여 게임장 앞에서 망을 보는 일명 ‘문빵’ 역할을 담당하는 등 피고인들은 불법게임장을 운영하기로 공모하였다.

1. Although no one is allowed to provide a game product for distribution or use, or display or store it for that purpose, the Defendants and I provided 40 game products, which are game products not rated at the above location from April 10, 2014 to unspecified customers, such as installing 40 game products, which are game products not rated at the above location from April 10, 2014, and allowing them to play games using the above game machine.

2. No one shall engage in business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products;

Nevertheless, the Defendants and I exchanged 18,00 won in cash by calculating the points obtained by many unspecified customers using the game machine as 20,000 won per four points.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of the evidence list Nos. 1 to 12 by the prosecutor

1. Relevant Article of facts constituting a crime and Article 44 of the Promotion of respective Game Industry Act which choose a punishment;