A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

[2018 Highest 3304] Defendant A is a business owner in charge of funding and public relations while operating a sexual traffic business establishment with six marina rooms equipped with bed and shower facilities in the third floor of the building located in the building located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul. Defendant B is a manager in charge of employment and management of employees, customer guidance, and settlement of earnings in the above "D."

From August 3, 2018 to October 23, 2018, the Defendants received KRW 100,000 in return for sexual traffic from the male grandchildren who wish to engage in sexual intercourse from the above “D,” and had the said male grandchildren and sexual intercourse with the said male grandchildren.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

[2018 Highest 3570] If a foreigner intends to find a job in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and no person shall employ any person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, while operating a place of sexual traffic in the third floor of the building located in Ulsan-gu, the third floor of the building located in Ulsan-gu, with knowledge of the fact that the Thailand and the women of the Kazakhstan who were introduced from female employees did not have the status of stay that they could engage in job-seeking activities, were unable to engage in job-seeking activities due to the status of stay in the B of the Kazakstan who could not engage in job-seeking activities due to the status of stay (G-1) in September 2018, and the B-1 of the visa exemption (B-1) around October 19, 2018, employed by the female employees of the above place of business until October 23, 2018, respectively.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to employ foreigners who do not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 3304]

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's office protocol against the Defendants.