beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.19 2015가합5762

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against B (C) who is represented by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status and composition of the original defendant 1) The plaintiff of D clan D (hereinafter referred to as "the family clan of this case").

) The Foundation established with the contribution of the property for the purpose of the F of E of the third class of wages in Joseon and the F of descendants and the harmony and friendship of the clans. According to the Plaintiff’s articles of incorporation (No. 1, No. 2, No. 3) (Evidence A) (Evidence A) of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff shall have nine directors (including one chief director and one chief director) and two auditors as its officers (Article 5 of the Articles of incorporation), and the nine directors among the nine directors shall be elected at the “G Council,” which shall be deemed below, while seven of the nine directors shall be elected at the H clan (Imol, J, Kmph, Lmph, Mmph, Mmph, Nmph, P, P, P, and the above clans referred to in the above clans in total, "the director of the H of this case" and the board of directors shall be elected according to the articles of incorporation and the board of directors (Article 16(2) (hereinafter referred to as the "chief chief director of the H of this case").

(Articles of Incorporation 6(1)3) and 7 of the Plaintiff separately from its executives. The Council members appoint one member for each of the instant H clan at the “Board of Directors” comprised of A’s directors (Articles of Incorporation 19(1) and (4)). Moreover, A has a “G Council” comprised of members of the board of directors and the members of the board of directors (Articles of Incorporation 20, 21). (b) The Plaintiff’s meeting and the board of directors, holding of the board of directors, appointment of officers, and appointment of officers (1) the board of directors held on April 23, 2012, the board of directors held on nine existing nine directors of the Plaintiff’s board of directors, with the remainder of seven directors other than P and B, held on May 1, 2012 and passed a resolution to elect a new director on May 1, 2012 at the same time as the term of office expires, the board of directors held on May 1, 2012 and the chairman of the board of directors at the same 10:5.