beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.02.24 2015고단6111

병역법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a person to be enlisted in active duty service on October 17, 2015, was notified of enlistment in active duty service on November 23, 2015 through e-mail at the Defendant’s house located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and was notified of enlistment to the Army Training Center located in Jung-gu, Sinsan-si on November 23, 2015, but failed to enlist

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written accusation;

1. Details of receipt of e-mail notified to enlistment, inquiry into military register, and application of statutes of notification of enlistment;

1. Grounds for conviction under Article 88 (1) 1 of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion is “C religious organization” and the Defendant refused to enlist in active service according to his religious conscience. This constitutes “justifiable cause” as prescribed by Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act.

2. Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act was prepared in order to embody the duty of national defense most fundamental, and as such, if the State’s security is not ensured because the duty of military service is not fulfilled properly, the dignity and value as human beings cannot be guaranteed. Thus, the duty of military service ultimately aims to ensure the dignity and value as human beings of all citizens, and the freedom of conscience of conscientious objectors is superior to the above constitutional legal interests. Thus, even if the freedom of conscience of conscientious objectors is restricted pursuant to Article 37(2) of the Constitution for the above constitutional legal interests, it constitutes a legitimate restriction permitted under the Constitution.

Meanwhile, the provision of Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which is a member of the Republic of Korea, appears to stipulate the same content as the scope of protection of fundamental rights guaranteed by the interpretation of the freedom of conscience under Article 19 of the Constitution and the freedom of religion under Article 20.