A. On August 20, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on KRW 20,000,000, monthly rent KRW 2,420,000 (including value-added tax, and payment on the second day of the following month), between November 2, 2013 and November 1, 2014 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

B. The Defendant leased and used the instant building to the office, and thereafter, the instant lease was implicitly renewed twice.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Defendant did not pay the same amount as indicated below out of the rent under the instant lease agreement.

Article 4 of the instant lease agreement provides that the lessor may terminate the contract immediately if the lessee has failed to pay the rent for at least two consecutive periods.

The plaintiff shall notify the termination of the lease agreement of this case through the service of the duplicate of the complaint of this case.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff and pay the unpaid rent (including value-added tax) and damages for delay.

For the period of delay in the aggregate of value-added tax on unpaid rents, KRW 220,00,000 for November 3, 2013; KRW 220,420,00 for 2,420,000 for December 1, 2013 to December 1, 206, KRW 146,67, KRW 146,67 for December 3, 2013; KRW 1,613,340 for January 3, 2014 to March 2016; and KRW 20,000 for February 20, 200 for the building from February 3, 2017 to February 3, 200 for the building from March 1, 201 to December 4, 200 for the building from March 1, 2017; and the Defendant is obligated to pay the gains from the building in this case.

B. Defendant 1’s instant building was not yet completed at the time the construction was to be occupied by the Defendant on November 2, 2013, and thus, it was difficult for the Plaintiff and the Defendant to use the building. As such, the entire rent for November 2013 and December 2013 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.