교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On June 28, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the same court issued a summary order of KRW 5 million by the same crime, etc. on December 28, 2012. On January 31, 2018, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million by the same court. On January 31, 2018, at the office of the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office, the Defendant was suspended from indictment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.
1. Around 23:50 on September 20, 2019, the Defendant driven a E-Poter II cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.041% without obtaining a driver’s license from a section of about 500 meters from the Do in front of the river at the time of leisure to the front road of the hospital located in C at the time of leisure, and without obtaining a driver’s license.
2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is the person who is engaged in driving cars of Epoter II.
On September 20, 2019, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on September 23:50, and continued to drive the vehicle on a four-lane road in front of the D Hospital, which is located in C at the time of leisure.
It is a four-lane road, and a commercial building and hospital have frequent traffic, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to verify and drive the career safety by complying with the lanes and properly examining the front and rear left.
Nevertheless, as described in Paragraph 1., the Defendant neglected this, while driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver's license, and driving the four-lane road in parallel without looking at the front and rear left, and did not discover a G Track vehicle driven by the victim F (F, South, and 30 years old) driving on the new third-distance distance from the side of the two service distance, and received the part of the above Track vehicle in front of the driving seat of the said motor vehicle operated by the Defendant.
Ultimately, the Defendant is obliged to perform the above duties.