사기
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2006. 12. 25.경 서산시 C 소재 D백화점 2층 202호에 있는 E가 운영하는 ‘F’라는 상호의 의류매장에서 피해자에게 “밍크 옷을 외상으로 주면 그 대금은 곧 지급하겠다“라는 취지로 거짓말을 하고, 2007. 1. 15.경 위 ‘F’ 의류매장에서 E에게 ”밍크 옷을 외상으로 주면 대금은 곧 지급하겠다“라는 취지로 거짓말을 하여 이에 속은 E로부터 2006. 12. 25. 시가 550만 원 상당의 양면밍크 옷 1벌을 교부받고, 2007. 1. 15.경 시가 850만 원 상당의 브라운밍크 옷 1벌을, 시가 1,500만 원 상당의 블랙롱밍크 옷 1벌을, 시가 500만 원 상당의 블랙숏밍크 옷 1벌을 교부받아 합계 3,400만 원 상당의 의류를 편취하였다.
2. Determination
A. The Defendant purchased minke clothes 4 punishment from E as stated in the facts charged, but the Defendant, as a matter of course, paid the fraternity money, paid the entire amount by having E receive the fraternity money, or by having the credit card under the name of the Defendant’s father, and even if the Defendant was unable to pay the entire amount, the Defendant continued to purchase clothes from E before and after the said transaction and paid the entire amount from time to time. As such, the Defendant deceptioned E.
The above facts charged are argued that it cannot be seen that the defendant had the intention to obtain fraud or that the defendant had the intention to obtain the above facts charged.
B. First of all, we examine whether the Defendant fully repaid the above minc clothes to E, and the amount of KRW 20 million in the limit argued by the Defendant to have paid the above mincing clothes on his behalf in order to pay the above mincing clothes is deemed to have been paid to E around February 25, 2006 before the Defendant purchased the above minc clothes (No. 37 of the Investigation Records). Rather, the Defendant did not appear to have paid the above mincing clothes to E on March 1, 2007. < Amended by Act No. 8535, May 25, 2008>