However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 25, 2014, around 19:15, the Defendant: (a) at the guest room in Seogu-gu, Seogu, Daegu; (b) at the guest room 208, the Defendant: (c) received a report from the said Damo Youth E, “I ambling with the guest while taking a bath;” and (d) was urged to return home from the Daegu, Seogu, Police Station F Zone G, and the slope H to the first floor parking lot of the said Domo.

피고인은 위 주차장에서 위 G, H에게 순찰차에 태워 달라고 요구하였으나 이를 거부당하자, 그를 달래며 귀가시키려던 G에게 삿대질을 하면서 “이 씨팔 놈들, 눈까리 동그랗게 뜨고 지랄이냐.”라는 등 욕설을 하고, 오른 손바닥으로 G의 왼쪽 뺨 부위를 1회 때린 후 그의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고, 목과 양쪽 팔을 할퀴어 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement concerning G;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 62 (1) of the same Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1114, Jan. 1,

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;