2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

On November 20, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “A deposit is necessary to lease a room in Jin-si E,” at the main point of the victim C’s operation D, which reads that “A deposit is to be lent KRW 1 million to the victim under the name of the deposit money for the payment of the money.”

However, the Defendant had no property at the time, and all kinds of public charges, including mobile phone charges, were unpaid, and there was no intention or ability to repay such charges even if he/she borrowed money from the injured party due to the circumstance where he/she did not pay the monthly rent of the leased room.

After all, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 1 million from the victim under the name of the deposit money and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;