However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around April 21, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would make a loan of KRW 20 million to KRW 20,000,000,000 to KRW 10,000,000,000 to KRW 100,000,000,000 to KRW 10,000,000 to KRW 3,00,000,000 to KRW 10,000,000 to KRW 10,00,000 to KRW 3,00 to KRW 10,00,00 to KRW 10,00,00 to KRW 10,00 to KRW 10,00 to KRW 5,00 to KRW 10,00 to KRW 10,00 to KRW 10,00 to KRW 5,00 to KRW 5,06,00 to KRW 20 to KRW 5,5,201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Account specification (Evidence Nos. 2);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing cash custody certificates and loan receipts;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [type of crime] - General Fraud Nos. 1 - Basic area of the amount of profit of less than 100,000,000 won [the scope of territory and recommendation] - The reduction element of imprisonment for six months or more to one year and six months (general person] reduction element of criminal punishment - None of criminal punishment [decision of sentence] 80 hours of imprisonment for two years of suspended execution for six months - The above sentencing person and the defendant recognized the above sentencing person and the defendant's mistake - The above sentencing person and the defendant did not make any effort for recovery of damage even if the amount of damage was not small, considering all the circumstances,