2. The judgment of the court below reveals that the defendant committed the crime in this case under the suspension of the execution on April 25, 207, which was sentenced to two years of imprisonment on September 28, 2010, which was sentenced to two years of probation on September 28, 2010, which was poor in quality of the crime in that the defendant committed the crime in this case under the state of high blood alcohol concentration of 0.116% since the distance of the defendant's driving was about 2 km, and the defendant was found to have been only about 2 km by the police's drinking control, and the defendant did not cause a traffic accident. The defendant is acknowledged to have no criminal record but to have a criminal record. The court below's argument that the defendant's punishment was changed in light of all the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's oral argument and the reason why the defendant had no special motive to commit the crime in this case, and there were no special reasons to recognize that the defendant's punishment was changed.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.