A shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 6 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A does not pay a fine.

Defendant

B A around 00:54 on July 12, 2018, while under the influence of alcohol CK5 cars and driving a two-lane road of the 16-31-lane in the west-gun Hapyeong-gun, Hap-gun, Hap-gun, G, the central separation zone was shocked by the left-hand part of the car while driving a two-lane road of the 16-31-lane Hap-gun, Hap-gun.

Defendant

B There is a concern that the police officer will be punished for drinking driving, and requested the defendant A to make a call to the scene of the accident, and then the police officer arrived at the site of the accident. On the same day, at around 01:10 on the same day, the police officer called "I have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to

Defendant

A knowing that Defendant B’s alcohol driving force was two times, Defendant B was driven by the police officer “I would have been driven by the police officer. I would have been asked by the police officer. I would have been driven by the proxy.” Defendant B said, “I would have known how I would not have been driven by the police officer,” and “I would have known how I would have not driven by the police officer,” and “I would have driven by the proxy engineer.”

Since then, Defendant A made a false statement to the police officer that “in-house was driven” and performed a drinking test, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “a vehicle was driven by a police officer” and “a traffic accident was caused by the operation of unreasonable hand-ons while driving a vehicle.”

As a result, Defendant A caused Defendant B to escape from committing a crime that constitutes a fine or heavier punishment, and Defendant B assisted and aided Defendant B to escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement of the defendant A

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Photographs related to accidents;

1. Application of the statutes governing response to communications data provision;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 151(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines);

B. Defendant B: Articles 151(1) and 32 of the Criminal Act.