However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

After the former head of the Gu of Incheon, G was prosecuted for committing an offense against the victim I and detained by the president of the HF government, on February 22, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor at the first instance court on February 22, 2012, and the Defendant was willing to have the victim, who is his wife South Korea, K, and K’s seat, receive a written application for punishment for G by force from the victim through J.

On March 2012, the Defendant promised to pursue the redevelopment project within the F territory and receive a prompt application for punishment from the victim, while there is a J in the “Nda” near the Incheon M Hospital, the Defendant conspiredd to receive a written application for punishment for G by force from the victim, on March 2012, the Defendant stated that the Defendant “I would receive a written application for punishment even if I would have been detained by the victim in an officetel or underground office,” and that “I would like to request 30 million won as expenses even if I would have received a written application for punishment,” and the Defendant conspired to receive a written application for punishment for G by force from the victim.

On March 22, 2012, K, L, etc. found the H Association office located in Incheon F as an office in accordance with the above public offering, and K shows the victim's letter sold for about one hour. L, using L, stating that “a request for punishment under the name of the association for the head of the Gu is made” is “a request for the victim to prepare a written request for punishment under the name of the association for the head of the Gu”. In order to prepare a written request for punishment under the name of the association from the victim, K, L, etc. heard the statement that the resolution of the board of directors is required and completed one week at the office.

On March 30, 2012, K and L sought from the victim the phrase “if he/she became aware of an application for no punishment, he/she may not have the head of the partnership. If he/she becomes aware of the application for no punishment, he/she need to make a decision that he/she will be in charge of his/her work.” From the perspective that he/she would cause harm and injury to the victim.

K and L are found to be the above partnership office around April 9, 2012 by the victim.