beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2018.04.17 2018고단10

특수협박등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Basic Facts] From around 2003, the Defendant is a person who resides in Gangseo-gun C in Gangwon-gu to the present time, the victim D (55) is a person who resides in E, a house in front of the Defendant’s residence, and the victim F (79 years old) is the mother of the victim D, and the victim G (56 years old) is the victim’s fraud.

From September 2016, the Defendant had been living with H in the above residence from around 2016, and had his family members of the victim of the suspicion of H serve alcohol, and spawn his happiness, and had the victim D have a far distance between the victim D’s family members.

이후 피고인은 2017. 12. 28. 경 H가 다시 피해자 D을 찾아가 술주정을 부리다가 피해자 D으로부터 “ 똘 아이” 라는 말을 듣고 쫓겨난 사실을 알게 되자, 이에 앙심을 품고 피해자 D의 주거지에 찾아가 위해를 가하기로 마음먹었다.

[Criminal facts]

1. 특수 협박 피고인은 2017. 12. 29. 16:30 경 강원 평창군 E에 있는 D의 집에서, F에게 “ 야 이 씹할 년 아, 개 같은 년 아, 좆같은 년 아, 아들 어딨어! ”라고 욕을 하다가 피해자 G에 의해 집 밖으로 끌려 나오던 중 D이 집 안에서 나오는 것을 발견하자, “ 아 씹할 놈들 다 죽여 버린다!

“After sound,” the Defendant was moved to the Defendant’s residence.

The defendant laid down a knife of approximately 80 cm length, which is dangerous articles in the warehouse located in the above defendant's residence, and again, knife D's house, and the victim G and the victim of Madju who was in the front room, "Woman Jeju-do fraud, and this knife is discarded.

“Fastly sound”.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim G with dangerous things.

2. The Defendant, in preparation for the prevention of a fire against the present owner's building, 16:40 around 16:40 on the same day, flusium, which is a dangerous object, as described in paragraph 1, shall be discarded to G. “The death of the present owner's Jeju-do fraud shall be discarded.”

“I”, H had a defect in H and a dispute between H and the Defendant, taking away his writing from the Defendant and entering the Defendant’s house.