If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

To the extent that it does not substantially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, the following facts charged shall be organized and criminal facts shall be recognized:

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of a C Pobb B-flopped cargo vehicle to which he/she belongs.

On February 12, 2014, at around 01:00, the Defendant was driving the said cargo vehicle on the road near the Ganwon Kimwon-gun Kim Jong-do, which is located in the bachelor's department of the Gangwon-do, at the same Eup Kim Jong-do, from the Myeon of the same Eup to the Myeon of Kim Jong-hwan elementary school.

At the time, it was anticipated that the view of the view was obstructed at night, and that the place was the bend length to the right, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent all accidents by safely proceeding with the right-hand side of the course in a clear mental state, such as making it possible for the driver to take the right-hand side of the course in a safe manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant left the right side of the road due to temporary stroke driving at the location of the accident, and strokes for the protection of children of the stroke material, which is the management object of the stroke Gun office located on India, installed on the front part of the driver's vehicle of the Defendant, was shocked into the front part of the plastic greenhouse owned by D, which was installed on the right side while going further.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, destroyed the fences, etc. for children’s protection to restore them to their original state amounting to KRW 3,420,00,00, and if the accident occurred due to the scattering of the road due to the accident, which caused the obstacle on the road, the Defendant immediately confirmed the degree of damage caused by the accident to the road, and then removed the damaged fugitives from the road to the road to prevent the danger of the second traffic accident, notwithstanding the fact that the damaged fugitives should be removed from the road, the Defendant left the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement in D and B preparation.