If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant will make a false transaction result by entering and leaving the account under the name of the defendant, and make it possible to receive a loan on the basis of this.

On April 2018, 2018, after receiving a proposal to the effect that “D,” the Defendant’s new bank accounts (number E) and spick-line 2, each linked to the two accounts held in the name of the Defendant in the name of “D” located in “D” located in “D” in the name of the Defendant, sent the Kakao Stockholm via Kwikset Services, and sent each password to the Kakao Stockholm message.

Accordingly, the defendant, knowing that he will be used in the crime, 2 accessible media was replaced by a name-oriented person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement of damage from G;

1. Details of the transfer of money from damage (eight pages of evidence records);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the detailed statement of transactions of the SC Bank;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 3 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;